WDCD Run #202: Average Instruction Decay Hits -73.2% Across 11 Models, Gemini 3.1 Pro Leads
WDCD Run #202 (2026-06-28) measured multi-turn commitment integrity across 11 frontier models, recording an average inst
WDCD 相关资讯
Claude 19.8分最大增幅 WDCD八模型全线上涨无一下降
本期WDCD测试中8个模型全部上涨、零下降，Claude Opus 4.7增幅达19.8分，Gemini 3.1 Pro以93.57分登顶，Grok 4紧随其后92.86分。
WDCD横评：安全合规成最大短板，11模型最高仅3.57分
WDCD五场景测试显示安全合规全体得分最低，最高仅deepseek-v4-pro 3.57/4，claude-sonnet-4.6垫底2.57/4；gemini-3.1-pro在数据边界与资源限制双4分，grok-4在业务规则独得4分，do
Grok 4零崩溃碾压GPT-o3 17%崩盘 WDCD三轮衰减暴露真实韧性
WDCD三轮测试显示，R1平均确认率0.95，R2抵抗率0.82，R3平均诚信率仅1.63/2。Grok 4在R3保持1.83/2且零崩溃，而Claude Sonnet 4.6与GPT-o3各崩6次（17.1%），多约束场景成为最大崩盘诱因
Gemini 3.1 Pro 93.57分 WDCD守约第一 文心一言4.5仅75.71分垫底
Gemini 3.1 Pro 以 WDCD 93.57 分位居首位，文心一言 4.5 以 75.71 分垫底。头部三名 R3 得分均超 1.69，尾部两名 R3 仅 1.34-1.54，R3 崩溃率达 8.8%。
WDCD Run #196: Average Instruction Decay Hits -39.9%, Qwen3 Max Leads Despite -90% Drop
WDCD Run #196 (2026-06-24) tested 11 leading models across three dialogue rounds, recording an average commitment decay
WDCD Run #185: Average Instruction Decay Hits -57.5% Across 11 Models, Qwen3 Max Leads at 92.5 Points
WDCD Run #185 (2026-06-17) measured multi-turn commitment across 11 models, recording an average instruction decay of -5
WDCD三轮衰减实测：GPT-o3 R3崩溃率50% Qwen3 Max零崩盘
WDCD三轮测试显示，R1平均确认率0.96，R2抵抗率降至0.76，R3平均诚信率仅75.5%。GPT-o3 R3崩溃率达50%，而Qwen3 Max、Claude Sonnet 4.6、文心一言4.5实现零崩溃，暴露多约束场景下的诚信断
Qwen3 Max 92.50分登顶 WDCD守约榜 豆包Pro 62.50分垫底差距30分
Qwen3 Max以92.50分位居WDCD守约排行榜首位，豆包Pro以62.50分垫底，头部与尾部相差30分。满分率47.3%，R3崩溃率16.4%。Claude Sonnet 4.6和DeepSeek V4 Pro分列二三位，GPT-o
WDCD Run #171: Average Instruction Decay Hits -37.9% Across 11 Models, Qwen3 Max Leads Despite Steep Drop
WDCD Run #171 (2026-06-14) measured multi-turn commitment across 11 frontier models, recording an average instruction de
Qwen3 Max 84.38分登顶 WDCD守约榜 GPT-o3 67.19分垫底拉开17分差距
Qwen3 Max以84.38分位居WDCD守约排行榜首位，GPT-o3以67.19分垫底。榜首与榜尾相差17.19分，R3崩溃率达25%，满分率仅37.8%。Qwen3 Max R3得分1.59领先，GPT-o3 R3仅0.84，显示三轮
WDCD Run #169: Grok 4 Leads Multi-Turn Commitment Test as Average Instruction Decay Drops to 4.5%
WDCD Run #169 (2026-06-13) evaluated 11 AI models on multi-turn commitment integrity, with Grok 4 topping the leaderboar
R3崩溃168次！Claude Opus 0.34分 vs Grok 1.22分，守约三轮真实衰减
WDCD三轮测试显示R1确认率0.94、R2抵抗率0.71、R3诚信率仅43.3%，168次完全崩溃。Claude Opus 4.7 R3仅0.34分而Grok 4达1.22分，多数模型R1高分后R3崩盘，资源限制与安全合规场景崩溃最集中。
Grok 4 74.22 分领跑，GPT-o3 51.56 分垫底 WDCD 差距 22.66
Grok 4 以 74.22 分位居 WDCD 守约测试首位，GPT-o3 以 51.56 分垫底。R3 崩溃率达 47.7%，满分率仅 19.3%。所有 11 个模型较上期均出现分数下滑，头部与尾部在压力轮得分差距明显。
Instruction Decay Measured: LLM Compliance Falls from 95.8% to 68.3% Under Three Rounds of Pressure
In WDCD Run #164 (June 11, 2026), 11 frontier LLMs acknowledged user constraints 95.8% of the time, but only 68.3% still
WDCD Run #164: Average Instruction Decay Hits -44.3% Across 11 Frontier Models
WDCD Run #164 (2026-06-11) evaluated 11 frontier models across three dialogue rounds, recording an average commitment de
R3崩溃率56.7%！GPT-o3三轮守约测试口是心非最严重
R1确认率96%、R2抵抗率81%却在R3跌至68.3%，73次完全崩溃暴露模型“嘴上答应身体诚实”本质。GPT-o3崩溃率最高达56.7%，Claude Sonnet仅6.7%，揭示持续压力下的真实行为模式。
GPT-5.5 88.33分登顶 GPT-o3 61.67分垫底 R3崩溃率22.1%
WDCD测试中GPT-5.5以88.33分夺冠，GPT-o3仅61.67分垫底，头部尾部差距26.66分，R3崩溃率22.1%。11模型中仅43.6%满分，新老版本表现剧烈分化。
WDCD Run #161: Average Instruction Decay Hits -48.6% Across 11 Models, GPT-5.5 Leads at 89.2 Points
WDCD Run #161 (2026-06-11) evaluated 11 large language models on multi-turn commitment integrity, recording an average i
R3崩溃率差7倍！11模型WDCD三轮守约真实衰减
R1确认率96%、R2抵抗率91%，R3诚信率骤降至70.4%，66次完全崩溃。GPT-o3崩溃率46.7%最高，GPT-5.5仅6.7%最稳，安全合规场景崩盘最集中。